This model is based on findings from fraud investigations conducted by Prosecure Consulting Inc. and case studies from Turkey, and is structured according to ACFE's Fraud Triangle (Pressure, Opportunity, Rationalization) and Fraud Tree methodologies (Transactional Risks, Conflict of Interest, Compliance / Governance).

It does not replace an evidence-based investigation; it helps identify professional review requirements by quickly detecting the risk of misconduct within the organization. Each question heading is evaluated with its own weighting coefficient; the results are presented in a Low/Medium/High/Critical risk band and generate applicable preventive recommendations for each level.

1. Does the employee have a lifestyle that cannot be explained by their income level?
Behavioural / Pressure
No
2. Does the employee frequently request loans, investments or advances from internal or external sources?
Behavioural / Pressure
No
3. Are there any reports of the employee engaging in gambling, betting or similar addictive behaviours?
Behavioural / Pressure
No
Is the employee under significant emotional pressure due to family or health issues or major changes in their life?
Behavioural / Pressure
No
5. Does the employee frequently work late hours alone, avoiding handing over tasks or taking holidays?
Behavioural / Pressure
No
6. Is there a lack of separation of duties, or is payment approval concentrated in one person?
Control / Opportunity
No
7. Are system accesses and user permissions not reviewed regularly?
Control / Opportunity
No
8. Is independent auditing or rotation not applied in critical financial processes (procurement, accounting, payment)?
Control / Opportunity
No
9. Is there any unusual closeness between the employee and the supplier, customer or intermediary (gifts, joint activities, personal benefits)?
Relationship / Opportunity
No
10. Does the employee frequently express that the organisation is not treating them fairly or that they are underpaid?
Culture / Rationalisation
No
11. Are there any examples of minor ethical violations being overlooked or not punished?
Culture / Rationalisation
No
12. Is the senior management's commitment to ethical values and the principle of integrity weak (weak tone at the top)?
Culture / Rationalisation
No
13. Are there frequent adjustment entries or unexplained reconciliation differences in the accounts?
Financial / Transactional
No
Are there any signs of income/expense inflation or cut-off errors at the end of the 14th period?
Financial / Transactional
No
15. Are there any recurring payments with the same amount or the same IBAN/address?
Financial / Transactional
No
16. Is there an unusually high volume of transactions with the same supplier, or is the alternative supplier unavailable?
Financial / Transactional
No
17. Are discrepancies identified in asset or inventory counts that are not reflected in the records?
Operasyonel / Transactional
No
18. Is there any indication of a conflict of interest between the employee and the supplier, such as kinship, partnership, or the same IBAN/address?
Relationship / Conflict of Interest
No
19. Are there any negative media reports, rumours or past investigations concerning the supplier or employee?
Reputasyon / Conflict of Interest
No
20. Is there an Ethics Hotline or reporting system within the company; however, is it not technically operational, or is it unknown to employees or not actively used?
Compliance
No
21. Does the internal audit or risk management unit regularly assess potential fraud risks and report them to senior management?
Governance
No
Please answer all the questions. I'm taking you to the missing question...

Your Test Results Are Ready

Please enter your information to view your detailed risk score, key findings, and actionable recommendations.

Total Risk

Low
0 / 100

Key Findings:

No analysis has been carried out yet.

Analysis and Recommendation:

The score will appear here once it has been calculated.

```
  • Services
  • Contact Us
Prosecure
Çevrimiçi