{"id":9632,"date":"2026-07-30T20:13:37","date_gmt":"2026-07-30T20:13:37","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/prosecure.com.tr\/litigation-support-and-dispute-investigations\/"},"modified":"2026-08-25T17:20:43","modified_gmt":"2026-08-25T17:20:43","slug":"litigation-support-and-dispute-investigations","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/prosecure.com.tr\/en\/litigation-support-and-dispute-investigations\/","title":{"rendered":"Litigation Support and Dispute Investigations"},"content":{"rendered":"\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n
\"Litigation<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
\n
\n Corporate Investigations & Risk Advisory<\/span>\n

Litigation Support and Dispute Investigations<\/h1>\n

What decides a matter is not being right, but being able to prove it: we develop the parties\u2019 connections, the chronology of events, and asset indicators \u2014 through a team formed in financial crime investigation \u2014 in a form your counsel can put straight into the record.<\/p>\n

\n Request a Case Review \u2192<\/span><\/a>\n What counsel receives \u2193<\/span><\/a>\n <\/div>\n

The initial consultation is confidential.<\/span><\/p>\n

\n
30+ years<\/b>Investigative experience in financial crime and complex commercial disputes, built in the public sector and private practice.<\/span><\/div>\n
FBI National Academy<\/b>205th Session; a systematic method for developing and corroborating findings.<\/span><\/div>\n
Financial Crimes & Aggravated Fraud<\/b>Head of unit at the Turkish National Police, 1992\u20132002; the discipline behind every case file.<\/span><\/div>\n
Source matrix<\/b>Each finding is reported with the source it rests on and its verification status.<\/span><\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n<\/section>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n
\n
\n Use cases<\/span>\n

Critical cases begin with clear research questions.<\/h2>\n

Every matter has its own scope. The work is built around the requirements of the proceeding and the specific question that needs an answer \u2014 it starts from what must be proven, not from what happens to be findable.<\/p>\n <\/div>\n

\n

Commercial disputes<\/h3>

When the counterparty\u2019s operations, corporate affiliations, and the commercial background of the dispute are missing from the record.<\/p><\/div>\n

Fraud and misconduct allegations<\/h3>

When the allegation, the links between events, and the individuals or entities involved call for independent investigation.<\/p><\/div>\n

Partnership and shareholder disputes<\/h3>

When relationships among shareholders, officers, and affiliated companies \u2014 and undisclosed interests \u2014 need to be established.<\/p><\/div>\n

Debt and asset recovery<\/h3>

When the counterparty\u2019s economic footprint, asset indicators, and related entities determine whether a claim is collectible.<\/p><\/div>\n

Arbitration and cross-border matters<\/h3>

When companies, individuals, and commercial relationships spanning multiple jurisdictions bear on recognition and enforcement of an award.<\/p><\/div>\n

Complex relationship networks<\/h3>

When connections across numerous people, companies, transactions, and events must become a structure a tribunal can follow.<\/p><\/div>\n <\/div>\n

If your matter falls under one of these headings: let\u2019s define the research questions together, in confidence \u2192<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n <\/div>\n<\/section>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n The cost of delay<\/span>\n

Evidence does not improve with waiting; it degrades<\/h2>\n

Disputes are rarely lost for want of a legal theory. They are lost because the proof that theory depends on was never developed in time.<\/p>\n <\/div>\n

Starting late carries financial<\/b>, legal<\/b>, reputational<\/b>, and time<\/b> costs at once: an unprovable claim becomes a loss, and a case filed on incomplete proof becomes a dead end on the merits. With every passing month, records are overwritten, commercial relationships are wound down, assets change hands, and the detail witnesses recall grows thin. That is why the first step is not a complaint but a short, confidential case review.<\/p>\n

Request a Case Review \u2192<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n <\/div>\n

\n The other half of the matter<\/span>\n

A judgment you win counts only if you can collect it<\/h3>\n

In most matters the dispute investigation runs alongside the asset question: can the counterparty pay, where did the assets go, and which structure stands behind them? Both strands proceed with the same team, as one file.<\/p>\n

\n

Pre-filing<\/p>

Asset position for prejudgment attachment and injunctive relief<\/p><\/div>\n

During the case<\/p>

Fraudulent transfers and concealment structures identified<\/p><\/div>\n

Post-judgment<\/p>

A traceable asset map for enforcement and collection<\/p><\/div>\n <\/div>\n

If the dispute grew out of misconduct, the work starts with what happened and who did it: it runs together with Fraud Investigation<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Asset Tracing & Recovery \u2192<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n

\n

74%<\/p>

Of victim organizations that pursued civil action, this share resolved in a settlement or a judgment in their favor \u2014 where the findings exist, the process works.<\/p>

ACFE, Report to the Nations 2024<\/i><\/p><\/div>\n

12 months<\/p>

Median time a scheme runs before it is detected; that is how old the evidence already is when the case is opened.<\/p>

ACFE, Occupational Fraud 2026<\/i><\/p><\/div>\n

$1.1M<\/p>

Median loss in schemes lasting more than five years; in those caught within the first six months, the same figure stays at $40,000.<\/p>

ACFE, Occupational Fraud 2026<\/i><\/p><\/div>\n

~40%<\/p>

Of incidents in T\u00fcrkiye carry a financial impact of TRY 5 million or more \u2014 the scale at which these disputes begin.<\/p>

PwC T\u00fcrkiye & TE\u0130D, 2026<\/p><\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n<\/section>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n
\n
\n Scope of research<\/span>\n

What can our research reveal?<\/h2>\n

We do not assess information item by item, but together with the connections among people, companies, economic activity, and events. The scope is confined to lawful, verifiable sources.<\/p>\n <\/div>\n

\n

Individual and corporate connections<\/h3>

The commercial and corporate ties the parties hold with one another and with third parties.<\/p><\/div>\n

Direct and indirect ownership<\/h3>

Ownership chains, subsidiaries, and the structures standing behind apparent title.<\/p><\/div>\n

Related parties and decision-makers<\/h3>

Separating the nominal representative from the actual decision-maker; identifying related-party transactions.<\/p><\/div>\n

Asset indicators<\/h3>

The counterparty\u2019s economic footprint and the recorded asset traces that speak to collectability.<\/p><\/div>\n

Event and transaction chronology<\/h3>

Placing critical events, corporate changes, and transactions in date order.<\/p><\/div>\n

International commercial connections<\/h3>

Companies, individuals, and commercial relationships across jurisdictions, traced through public records.<\/p><\/div>\n <\/div>\n

On why a perpetrator rarely acts alone \u2014 our article: Is fraud an individual act, or a team effort? \u2192<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n <\/div>\n<\/section>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n
\n
\n Systematic approach<\/span>\n

Our litigation support process<\/h2>\n

Each phase runs inside a controlled, traceable structure built around the research questions. Every step produces a concrete work product counsel can take forward.<\/p>\n <\/div>\n

\n
01<\/span>

Case review<\/h3>

The subject of the dispute, the parties, and the core questions are established; what must be proven becomes explicit.<\/p>

Output<\/em>Research questions<\/p><\/div>\n

02<\/span>

Research plan<\/h3>

Hypotheses, sources, jurisdictions, and the limits of the engagement are set; the boundary of lawfulness is drawn at the outset.<\/p>

Output<\/em>Scope and source plan<\/p><\/div>\n

03<\/span>

Research and verification<\/h3>

Open sources, corporate registries, and lawful information sources are searched; every finding is corroborated.<\/p>

Output<\/em>Source matrix<\/p><\/div>\n

04<\/span>

Connections and chronology<\/h3>

Relationships among people, companies, events, and transactions are analyzed and rendered into a structure that can be argued.<\/p>

Output<\/em>Relationship map<\/p><\/div>\n

05<\/span>

Reporting<\/h3>

Findings are delivered with source references in a single file counsel can use directly.<\/p>

Output<\/em>Litigation support file<\/p><\/div>\n <\/div>\n

On how a finding is tested \u2014 our article: Why is cross-examination still critical? \u2192<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n <\/div>\n<\/section>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n
\n
\n Decision support<\/span>\n

Outputs provided to the legal team<\/h2>\n

Not raw information, but work product that is connected, sourced, and ready for the record. Scope varies with the matter; format follows the way your team works.<\/p>\n <\/div>\n

\n

Research report<\/h3>

Findings, sources, and critical assessments set out in a clear, traceable structure.<\/p><\/div>\n

Relationship map<\/h3>

Relationships among people, companies, and connected entities made visible at a glance.<\/p><\/div>\n

Event chronology<\/h3>

A timeline of critical events and corporate changes in date order.<\/p><\/div>\n

Source matrix<\/h3>

Which source each finding rests on, and its verification status, itemized.<\/p><\/div>\n

Executive summary<\/h3>

A concise summary of the core findings and conclusions for the decision-maker.<\/p><\/div>\n

Scope and limitations note<\/h3>

What was researched and, just as important, what could not be \u2014 separating assumption from verified finding.<\/p><\/div>\n <\/div>\n

We shape the deliverable around your matter: let\u2019s discuss what you need, in confidence \u2192<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n <\/div>\n<\/section>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n
\n
\n
\n Prosecure, in brief<\/span>\n

Investigative by origin. Defensible findings.<\/h2>\n

Prosecure does not practice law. We provide research and analysis support to outside counsel and in-house legal teams. In a complex matter, placing information in the right context matters as much as obtaining it.<\/p>\n <\/div>\n

\n

Every matter is run by the founder.<\/p>\n

Hasan Alsancak \u2014 Former Head of the Financial Crimes and Aggravated Fraud Units, Turkish National Police (1992\u20132002) \u00b7 FBI National Academy, 205th Session \u00b7 30+ years\u2019 career, with Prosecure since 2014. He sets the research questions with counsel, leads the work, and signs the report.<\/p>\n

Case information and findings are shared only with authorized individuals; confidentiality governs the engagement throughout.<\/p>\n

Meet the founder \u2192<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n<\/section>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n
\n
\n Memberships and professional affiliations<\/span>\n
\n
\"FBI<\/div>\n
\"ACFE<\/div>\n
\"US\u0130UD\"<\/div>\n
\"PBSA\"<\/div>\n
\"ASIS<\/div>\n
\"UNAFEI\"<\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n<\/section>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\nAnonymized case examples<\/span>

Not every matter reaches the same outcome.<\/h2>

The purpose of the work is not to wear the other side down; it is to put the legal strategy on verifiable ground and to show the real limits of the matter from the outset.<\/p><\/div>

\n\n01<\/span>\nConnection established<\/span>\n

Two seemingly unrelated companies were documented as answering to the same decision-maker<\/h3>\n

Commercial registry filings, signature authorities, and trading records were reviewed together. The shared management link between the contracting counterparty and the losing bidder was established; the relationship map and source matrix went into the record.<\/p>\nReview the case \u2192<\/span><\/span>\n<\/a>\n\n02<\/span>\nChronology turned the case<\/span>\n

In a shareholder dispute, the sequence of key decisions reversed the allegation<\/h3>\n

Corporate changes, delegations of authority, and transaction dates were consolidated into a single timeline. The order of filings contradicted the counterparty\u2019s \u201cwe learned of it later\u201d position and was submitted in the arbitration.<\/p>\nReview the case \u2192<\/span><\/span>\n<\/a>\n\n03<\/span>\nLimited result \u2014 scope narrowed<\/span>\n

In a cross-border matter, accessible sources proved limited and the scope was reset<\/h3>\n

Records in the target jurisdiction are closed to the public, so the expected connection could not be corroborated. What could not be researched was reported plainly; counsel redirected resources to the structure in a second jurisdiction where results were achievable.<\/p>\nReview the case \u2192<\/span><\/span>\n<\/a>\n<\/div>

For confidentiality, no company, sector, individual, amount, or country is identified in these examples; the matters have been anonymized and summarized.<\/p>

If you have a comparable matter: let\u2019s discuss it in confidence \u2192<\/span><\/a><\/p><\/div><\/section>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n
\n
\n Related services<\/span>\n

A dispute rarely arrives alone.<\/h2>\n

A matter often surfaces the source of the loss, the counterparty\u2019s asset position, or a business partner\u2019s history. These engagements run on the same investigative discipline, each completing the other.<\/p>\n <\/div>\n

\n
\"Asset<\/div>

Asset Tracing & Recovery<\/h3>

Connects the judgment to collection: traces assets before and after filing, along with true ownership and concealment structures.<\/p>Explore the service \u2192<\/span><\/span><\/a>\n

\"Internal<\/div>

Fraud Investigation<\/h3>

Finds the source of the loss: examines employee, executive, or partner misconduct in confidence \u2014 often where the matter begins.<\/p>Explore the service \u2192<\/span><\/span><\/a>\n

\"Third<\/div>

Third Party Risk Management<\/h3>

Prevents the next dispute: verifies a partner\u2019s or supplier\u2019s ultimate beneficial owner before the contract is signed.<\/p>Explore the service \u2192<\/span><\/span><\/a>\n <\/div>\n

In-depth research before a decision: Corporate Intelligence<\/a>  \u00b7  Risk in hiring: Employment Background Check<\/a>  \u00b7  Know Your Employee<\/span>\u2122<\/a><\/p>\n

Measure your own organization\u2019s fraud risk: Fraud Risk Simulator<\/span>\u2122<\/a>  \u00b7  About Prosecure: About Us<\/a>  \u00b7  Founder<\/a><\/p>\n <\/div>\n<\/section>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n
\n
\n Frequently asked questions<\/span>\n

What you might want to know before starting<\/h2>\n

Core questions on the scope of the work, its legal character, timing, and our approach to confidentiality.<\/p>\n <\/div>\n

\n
What is litigation support and dispute investigation?<\/summary>
Litigation support is the research a legal team needs in a dispute, developed from lawful and verifiable sources and organized into a form that can be used in the matter. The work covers the parties\u2019 connections, the chronology of events and transactions, affiliated corporate structures, and asset indicators. The deliverable is a research report in which every finding is tied to its source, together with a relationship map and an event chronology.<\/div><\/details>\n
Does Prosecure provide legal advice?<\/summary>
No. Prosecure provides research and analysis support to law firms and in-house legal teams. Our work is not a substitute for legal opinion or representation; legal strategy remains with the client\u2019s counsel.<\/div><\/details>\n
Is the same research carried out for every case?<\/summary>
No. Scope is set by the subject of the dispute, the parties, the jurisdictions involved, and the research questions that need answering. During the case review we are equally clear about which questions research can answer and which it cannot.<\/div><\/details>\n
Can international research be conducted?<\/summary>
Yes. Depending on the scope of the matter and the sources available, cross-border corporate structures and commercial connections can be researched. Public records differ from one jurisdiction to the next; we tell you what can be corroborated in which country while the scope is being set.<\/div><\/details>\n
Can the findings be used in legal proceedings?<\/summary>
The work is an independent investigation resting on public and lawful sources. Findings are reported with their source, date, and verification status, so they can be placed in the record and defended against challenge. How and at what stage they are used is a decision for the client\u2019s counsel.<\/div><\/details>\n
How long does the research take?<\/summary>
Timing depends on the number of parties, the jurisdictions, the data sources, and the complexity of the matter. An estimated timeline is shared after the case review. Where a hearing date or an application for interim relief imposes a deadline, the work is prioritized accordingly.<\/div><\/details>\n
What does it cost to postpone the research?<\/summary>
Waiting does not strengthen a matter. As time passes, records are updated, commercial relationships are wound down, assets change hands, and the detail witnesses recall grows thin. The cost of a short, confidential case review sits well below the cost of running a matter on incomplete findings.<\/div><\/details>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n<\/section>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n
\n
\n
\n Next step<\/span>\n

How do we start?<\/h2>\n

Three steps: a confidential conversation, a short case review, and a scope agreed together. Nothing is binding until that scope is approved.<\/p>\n

Request a Case Review \u2192<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n

The initial consultation is confidential and creates no obligation; we respond within one business day.<\/p>\n <\/div>\n

\n
    \n
  • 1 \u00b7 Confidential first conversation<\/b> \u2014 We listen to the subject of the dispute, the parties, and any hearing schedule; we clarify the questions you need answered.<\/li>\n
  • 2 \u00b7 Case review and scope<\/b> \u2014 We assess which questions can be answered from which sources, then propose scope, jurisdictions, and an estimated timeline.<\/li>\n
  • 3 \u00b7 Research and report<\/b> \u2014 Sources are searched and findings corroborated; the file is delivered with a relationship map, chronology, and source matrix.<\/li>\n <\/ul>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n<\/section>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

    Corporate Investigations & Risk Advisory Litigation Support and Dispute Investigations What decides a matter is not being right, but being able to prove it: we develop the parties\u2019 connections, the chronology of events, and asset indicators \u2014 through a team formed in financial crime investigation \u2014 in a form your counsel can put straight into […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":10838,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-9632","page","type-page","status-publish","has-post-thumbnail","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/prosecure.com.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/9632","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/prosecure.com.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/prosecure.com.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/prosecure.com.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/prosecure.com.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=9632"}],"version-history":[{"count":17,"href":"https:\/\/prosecure.com.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/9632\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":11258,"href":"https:\/\/prosecure.com.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/9632\/revisions\/11258"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/prosecure.com.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/10838"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/prosecure.com.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=9632"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}